Thursday, April 28, 2016


Seek not to be better than our neighbor, but to be better than ourselves.

Wednesday, April 27, 2016


We often mistake the true purpose of forgiveness. We assume it is for those who we forgive, but the greatest benefactor is actually ourselves. 
Forgiveness does not justify another’s actions. 
It simply enables you to no longer be affected by them.

50 degrees of separation

Posted by Picasa

Monday, April 25, 2016

The Food Police...What's their beef?

Delete From Watch ListEmail Article

Patience, Hell, Let's Sue Somebody

By RonaldMcDonald
Posted Wednesday, September 22, 2004 on Ronald's Blog
Discussion: Humor 'Patience, Hell, Let's Sue Somebody'
By Dan Gainor Commentary
September 22, 2004

The food police are looking to take a healthy bite out of corporate America. What is their beef? They think the food industry is making all of us fat. Are they recommending we eat less or hit the gym? Not really. Their solution is lawsuits, of course.

At least they are public about it. But not too public thanks to the media that gives little attention to this cottage industry. This past weekend a few dozen health professionals and the lawyers they love got together in Boston for the 2nd Annual conference of "Legal Approaches to the Obesity Epidemic." Don't let the vagueness of that title fool you. Though the conference focused on litigation, regulation and taxation, it was the first of those that drew the most attention.

Heading up the panel entitled, "Patience, hell. Let's sue somebody," was George Washington University law professor John Banzhaf III. Other speakers had discussed everything from marketing to food addiction. Banzhaf wasn't so subtle.

After reminding the crowd how helpful the courts have been in everything from civil rights to environmental protection to homosexual rights, Banzhaf began ticking off his laundry list of potential legal targets.

-- Parents - especially during custody hearings;
-- School boards and individual members;
-- Doctors who don't tell obese patients to lose weight.

Another lawyer on the panel said, "The food industry has the mindset of Enron." If you guessed that they plan to sue everybody in the industry, you would probably be right.

It's unfortunate that lawsuit advocates and the Nanny State don't understand how a free market works. Heck, it's a concept so simple that even Kevin Costner's "Field of Dreams" character Ray Kinsella could manage it. "If you build it, he will come."

The food industry certainly realizes it. According to a Slate article from last September, "No one can specify the size of the Atkins market, but experts estimate it's at least $1 billion per year." In other words, if customers want smaller sizes, fewer calories or fewer carbs, the industry will gladly provide it to them.

That's all it takes. No laws. No regulations. No wild-eyed lawyers chasing ice cream trucks instead of ambulances. We just need a free market solution with a dash of personal responsibility thrown in.

Instead, we get a roomful of people who want to control what industry makes, what they say, what they sell and what we eat. (And maybe grab a hefty legal fee at the same time.) Here are just a few nuggets from their discussions:

-- They want warning labels on soft drinks that warn, "May cause obesity."
-- They want food labeling in restaurants. They don't mention that they want to use any discrepancies between the labels and actual foods as another reason to sue.
-- They support taxes to fight the food industry such as a $1.5 billion levy on soda each year.
-- They back serving free fruits and vegetables in all schools, even if that costs billions of dollars.

The real message from the conference is two-fold. The first part is that the left is gunning for any business involved in food production - including ones they like. Speakers attacked companies from Pepsi to McDonald's. Even liberal actor Paul Newman was skewered for his product line because it uses high fructose corn syrup which isn't "natural" (Newman donates all of the profits from his salad dressings and has given more than $150 million to charities since 1982). The speakers targeted whole industries as well as corn growers, the meat industry, supermarket chains, restaurants, etc.

The other message came from the media, which was largely absent. It doesn't take a Microsoft Word document to understand we have a lawsuit crisis in this country. Unfortunately, a planning session to sue an entire industry didn't seem exciting enough for most of the major media.

Ironically, the conference achieved in two days what the speakers damned the food industry for - the very thing that makes them "worthy" of being sued. Speaker after speaker discussed food, showed advertisements and pictures of Oreos and other tasty snacks, in effect promoting the products and making us hungry. They also gave us a large supply of food with cake, muffins and bagels and cream cheese. (Yes, we had a few healthy items as well, but it wasn't a tofu fest.) Of course some in the crowd overate. Then, to make matters worse, they had us sit for hour after hour, just like most of us do in our day jobs.

I can't speak for my fellow attendees, but I figure they made me hungry, then gave me too much to eat and discouraged exercise. In my case, that probably worked out to a pound or two.

Perhaps, Professor Banzhaf needs help filing a new class action suit.

(The author is director of the Media Research Center's Free Market Project)